“Jennifer Aniston’s Journey: Coping with Disappointment of Unfulfilled Family Plans and Seeking Professional Help to Save Marriage with Justin Theroux”

During their seven-year relationship, Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux seemed to be deeply in love. However, in 2017, they confronted significant challenges and decided to seek therapy together, as reported by the latest issue of People magazine. A source revealed that the couple attempted to work things out for several months. Their problems went beyond their differing preferences for Los Angeles and New York City, which made Aniston unhappy. Another major challenge was their inability to start a family together.

They worked hard to make it work: Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux 'tried therapy' to make their marriage work, according to People; this is their last public appearance in July

Jennifer Aniston and Justin Theroux reportedly made an effort to save their marriage by seeking therapy. People magazine reported that the couple attempted to work through their issues before ultimately deciding to end their relationship. Their last public appearance together was in July.

No kids: And their issues were not just about how he disliked Los Angeles and she couldn't stand New York City. They also had to get past that they could not start a family together

The couple faced more than just their disagreement over the cities they lived in, with one disliking Los Angeles and the other unable to tolerate New York City. Their relationship was further hindered by the fact that they were unable to have children together.

The insider did not go into specifics about what they did, but in the past friends have claimed she was using IVF

The anonymous source did not provide detailed information about the couple’s attempts to have children, but it has been suggested by friends in the past that Jennifer Aniston was undergoing IVF treatments. The insider revealed that early on in their relationship, Aniston and Justin Theroux had hoped to start a family together. Despite their efforts, they were unable to conceive and this was a source of sadness for Aniston. However, it did not become an all-consuming issue for her. It is unclear whether the couple considered adoption, as Aniston’s ex-husband Brad Pitt had done with Angelina Jolie. Aniston has previously stated her desire to have children when the time was right, and she loved spending time with children such as her goddaughter, Coco. Although Theroux had given up on their marriage months before, Aniston was reluctant to let go until recently. The insider revealed that Aniston is feeling ‘sad and disappointed’ after the couple announced their separation on Valentine’s Day, although neither has filed for divorce yet.

Hard times: And while he gave up on their marriage several months ago, Jennifer did not want to give up until just recently. The source added she is 'sad and disappointed.' Seen in 2013

The situation is tough: Jennifer’s marriage has been on the rocks for a while now. Although her partner gave up on their union months ago, Jennifer was determined to keep it together until recently. She is feeling sad and disappointed about the end of their marriage, according to sources. Apparently, the couple could not find a common ground that would make them both happy, leading to exhaustion and frustration. However, Jennifer isn’t interested in looking for new love just yet, as she never enjoyed dating and always found it awkward and unpleasant. She also dreads the media attention that will inevitably come with her newfound single status. Despite this, Jennifer remains a big believer in love and hopes to find a partner to share her life with. For now, though, she seems to be handling her singlehood okay.

Better times: Jennifer  didn't appear to be wearing her blingy diamond engagement ring when she and husband Justin Theroux posed for an event in Paris in April last year

Things were looking up: Back in April of last year, Jennifer and her husband Justin Theroux were spotted at an event in Paris, but eagle-eyed fans quickly noticed that she was not wearing her flashy diamond engagement ring.

Can't miss that: The 49-year-old flashed the huge rock at the Oscars in Hollywood in 2013

You can’t overlook this: In 2013 at the Hollywood Oscars, a massive rock was flaunted by the 49-year-old.

The Friends star will not have to give back the eight-carat, emerald-cut diamond engagement ring

According to legal expert David Glass, the actress from Friends will not be required to return her eight-carat, emerald-cut diamond engagement ring worth $500,000. A friend of hers mentioned that she is grateful for her amazing life and would consider herself lucky. Her co-star, Matt LeBlanc, also commented on her situation and stated that she is a strong woman who can manage the split well. Although it is thought that they signed prenuptial agreements before their marriage in 2015, this may not include the ring Justin Theroux gave her in 2012. David Glass, a specialist in family law based in L.A., confirmed this news to People on Tuesday.

Pals

Jennifer Aniston’s engagement ring from her former husband, Justin Theroux, is considered her separate property and she gets to keep it despite their divorce, according to a legal expert. The same goes for any engagement ring given before the marriage. The couple’s other assets are still being divided, but Aniston reportedly retains ownership of her $21 million mansion in Los Angeles. In contrast, Theroux owns an apartment in New York City that he purchased for $600,000 and renovated for $1 million. Aniston’s net worth is estimated at $200 million, which far exceeds Theroux’s.

Normal pre-nup details: Both stars are expected to hold on to the properties they owned before their marriage, including Jen's $21 million L.A. mansion which is still in her name

The typical prenuptial agreement includes provisions that allow both celebrities to keep their respective pre-marital assets, such as Jen’s luxurious $21 million mansion in Los Angeles that remains under her name. According to David Glass, it is highly probable that the agreement would have also preserved the value of these assets and any appreciation during the marriage. Any jointly-owned property, such as joint bank accounts and real estate acquired during their marriage, would be subject to division. The couple’s most recent public appearance was in July.

Scroll to Top